| March 17, 2011 |
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (Stockholm Network) |
Although Europe seems to have developed a consensus that emission trading is the only plausible mechanism to address climate change, a new Stockholm Network paper by the London School of Economics\' Andrés Jonathan Drew skilfully illustrates many of the weaknesses of emissions trading, showing that genuine concern about the climate need not drive one to embrace emissions trading as a solution. Drew shows that market-based instruments are better suited than command and control approaches to addressing climate change, but also argues that an optimal policy mix would include market ;mechanisms other than simple emissions trading. |
 |
| October 22, 2010 |
The unequal effect of new banking rules in Europe (Bruegel) |
In this new policy paper (direct PDF link here) from Bruegel, authors Benedicta Marzinotto and Jörg Rocholl argue that the monetary policy response to the credit-tightening of "Basel III" is not likely to be accommodating, and that the aggregate costs of the measures will be differently distributed across countries depending on a variety of issues. |
 |
| October 1, 2010 |
Calculating the Benefits of EU-US Free Trade (ECIPE) |
A new ECIPE study by Fredrik Erixon and Matthew Bauer examines the potential gains from a transatlantic zero-tariff agreement on trade in goods. The idea of deeper transatlantic economic integration has become more attractive in recent years. The hopes for an ambitious multilateral trade deal in the Doha Round negotiations have diminished; few countries appear ready to accept ambitious liberalisation on the global level. Leaders have increasingly turned to bilateral or regional trade initiatives, but few of them are capable of delivering sizeable gains to big economies like the European Union and the United States. |
 |
| August 25, 2010 |
Europe’s Missing "Yollies" |
"Yollies" is short for "young leading innovators," and Europe is running short on them, argues a new policy brief from Bruegel. The authors, Bruegel Senior Fellow Reinhilde Veugelers and ULB professor Michele Cincera, explain why the European Union\'s research and development deficit, relative to the United States, can be attributed to the EU having fewer yollies, especially those that are less R&D intensive. Policy makers should pay attention to the heterogeneity across young sectors, say the authors, and design sector-specific measures to boost innovation and growth in the EU. |
 |
| June 17, 2010 |
Put Europe’s 2020 Agenda "in the bin" (ECIPE) |
The European Union’s 2020 strategy for growth and competitiveness is deeply flawed, argues Fredrik Erixon in ECIPE\'s new Policy Brief titled The Case Against Europe\'s 2020 Agenda. Erixon argues that the EU plan "will push neither economic growth nor pro-growth reforms." According to the summary, "There is no point toying with marginal changes of the strategy. It should be put in the bin, and EU leaders should start afresh." |
 |
|
|